Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Academic Fencing: Review and Counterreview.

Margaret J. Osler’s recent review of Catherine Wilson’s new book - Epicureanism at the Origin of Modernity - is feisty to say the least. According to Osler,

A good history of Epicureanism in early modern thought would be a welcome addition to the existing literature. Unfortunately, this is a gap that Wilson’s book does not fill. It suffers from a number of problems — some systemic and some detailed — that undermine its reliability. Her view of seventeenth-century issues is blinkered because she restricts her analysis to an account of philosophers who hold a place in the modern canon of the history of philosophy. This limitation coupled with a tendency to make anachronistic judgments prevents her from examining the abundance of alternatives that competed with Epicureanism in seventeenth-century philosophy. Further, she neglects to consider other traditions — such as late Scholasticism, alchemy, Renaissance humanism, Copernican astronomy, and Galileo’s new science of motion — that contributed directly to the development of a corpuscularian philosophy and an empirical and experimental approach to natural knowledge. Her own patently intolerant attitude towards theology prevents her from understanding that theological presuppositions were virtually axiomatic for most of the philosophers of the period.

That’s pretty rough, don’t you think? “She neglects to consider other traditions” is the most annoying move in the above citation - the book clearly limits itself to Epicureanism, therefore the charge that one neglects other traditions is preposterous, but let’s read on.

Many of the book’s flaws flow from the narrow range of Wilson’s definition of philosophy, a neglect of much recent scholarship, and what I can only call a perverse reading of some of the texts.

[...]

Wilson’s discussion of the mechanical philosopher and chemist Robert Boyle suffers from an incomplete reading of both his own writings and the wealth of recent scholarship about him. The sources of Boyle’s philosophy of nature are far more complex than Wilson suggests.

[...]

Because the book suffers from both a shortage of connective tissue binding the separate chapters into an organic whole and a general conclusion, there are problems of organization and unity.

This is just mean, I think, a kind of an academic bitch slap: “Not only is your book bad, you are also stupid to have written it, if of course one assumes you can write at all.” What is the deal with this? Next thing you know, Olson will be criticizing the cover of the book and the general smell of its pages. Where does such aggression originate? Be patient, faithful reader, I believe we have the answer.

Catherine Wilson is not taking this bullshit of a review without a fight - she has posted a response to Osler on PhilPapers, you can see the document here (.doc). It begins with the same reaction that I had to the review (confirming that I am not crazy):

My book, Epicureanism at the Origins of Modernity, OUP 2008, is said to be unreliable, to lack connective tissue, to have problems of organization and unity, and I, the author, am said to be blinkered, anachronistic, neglectful, uncritical, old-fashioned, narrow, a perverse reader, and a historian who makes claims with no support.

I am surprised by all this. How could a reviewer get so little out of a book, especially one that, as MO notes, is based on previously published (and mostly refereed, I might add) articles and chapters appearing over the last 25 years?

It’s a bit of a weak start, basically an academic equivalent of “who do you think you are?!” - others read my work and approved of it, how can you suggest it’s all wrong in so many ways? But Wilson gets right to the point - this mean review is a reaction to Wilson’s own mean review of Olson twelve years ago:

Twelve years ago I wrote a somewhat critical review of Margaret Osler’s own Divine Will and the Mechanical Philosophy ( Dialogue 36 (1997), pp. 597-606.)… I invite anyone interested to look up that review and compare the language and tone with that of the NDPR review.

That is - “I might have been mean to Oslon, but the language and tone were completely different.” Now, suggesting that Osler is motivated by revenge, a strange kind of revenge, before Wilson goes through the major objections and refutes them is a nice move aimed to show that Wilson is not below a good old fashioned punch in the ribs. Wilson then goes through a number of objections and responds to them.

What puzzles me here is, of course, the utter idiocy of exchanging mean remarks (admittedly most of them come from Oslen) on such a topic without a real engagement with the issues at hand. The remarks themselves are quite lame and unimaginative - if you are going to openly abuse each other, dear scholars, why not do it with venom and style that was so prevalent and so masterfully applied in… well, I don’t know, let’s say SEVENTEETH CENTURY!

The Bibles: A Repository of the Customs in the Near East

The Bibles: A Repository of the Customs in the Near East (March 25, 2009)

 

 

Note 1:  I have published five posts on the theme of customs and tradition in the Near East extracted from the Bibles, Old and New, with some development and clarifications to the benefit of the western civilizations.  This series of posts was inspired by the book that I reviewed “The Syrian Christ” by Abraham Metrie Rihbany; it was published in English in 1916 and I read the Arabic translation.  I thought that it was a good idea to attach relevant contexts to the fragment of verses that predicators are found of using on the ground that abstract concepts don’t need any historical, geographic, or people’s customs context. The customs and traditions of the Land in the Levant were practiced thousands of years before Judaism came to be.  The Jewish religion adopted the customs of the Land and wrote in the same style of imagery, maxims, and aphorism. The original manuscripts describe accurately the culture of the Land and in the same style.

 

Note 2: The Bibles are not famous for historical accuracies; they were not written by the dozens of scribes for that purpose.  The Bibles are excellent sources as repositories of the customs and traditions in the Near East which are still practiced for over five thousand of years.  It has been said that if Abraham and his generation were resurrected they will feel perfectly at home and go about their daily routines and tasks as if they have just waken from a dream.  Although “modernism” was forced upon the Levant, especially in the urban centers and megalopolis areas, the remote towns and villages have been practically spared and left untouched, even for cooking their weekly load of Levantine bread.  In this article, Near East and Levant group Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria as one Land that the Bibles describe the customs and tradition of its people.

 

A brief Introduction: Since time immemorial the Near East was famous for exporting olive oil, grape wine and dried figs.  No wonder that grape vine, olive trees and fig trees are the symbols of prosperity and shade in this region where it does not rain for straight seven months. The coastal regions of the Levant imported all kinds of grains, especially, wheat and lentil. 

The meals are frugal and consisting of thin large loaves of bread (khobz markouk) baked in special underground oven once a week, a few olives, tomatoes, onion, vegetable from the garden, and dried fruits in the off seasons. Wheat was transformed in crushed wheat (borghol) for the kebeh and tabouli; diary components were cooked into many varieties of cheese, yogurt, labneh, and keshk.  Meat was scarce and a single sheep was over fed during summer to be slaughtered in late autumn and the meat cooked and dried (kaworma) and saved for winter for the omelets. A couple of goats or cows lived in the basement or a side room and chicken were raised for eggs and for the occasional guests.  Nothing would go to waste and summer time was a hectic period for all kinds of chores related to storing provisions for winter.

Although “modernism” was forced upon the Levant, especially in the urban centers and megalopolis areas, the remote towns and villages have been practically spared and left untouched, even for cooking their weekly load of Levantine bread.  In this article, Near East and Levant group Palestine, Jordan, Lebanon, and Syria as one Land that the Bibles describe the customs and tradition of its people.

 

On the Written Style

 

The written style in the Levant is characterized by direct pronouncements expressing feeling and describing what is seen and heard.  The sentences are not encumbered by prefixes such as “I think”, “I believe”, “I am not sure”, “It is possible”, “There might be other versions”, “I might be wrong”, or “It is my opinion”, or what the western writers have adopted from the Greek rational style.  The style in the Levant sounds confident, categorical, and conveying the total truth though it does not mean that the people cannot discriminate or feel the variations and uncertainties.  The writers in the Levant simply feel that all these attachments are redundant since it is a fact of life that nothing is categorical or certain; thus, superfluous additions disturb the flow of thoughts and the ideas that need to be conveyed.  Consequently, the author feels that the western readers of the Bible should tone down their uneasiness with “outrageous” direct and assured pronouncements in the Bible.

 

 On the Verbal Style

 

The verbal style tends toward the devotional and far from the business approach. The dialect in the Levant reveals the relationship with the Creator is the first of wisdoms and spirituality is a foundation.  The recurring mention of God the provider at the beginning of any reply or “peace of God be upon you” or telling a worker “God gives you health” or to the harvester “God bless your crop” or asking the shepherd “How are the blessed ones?” or saying “What’s its religion?” to get more information on the nature of a thing are all part of the daily utterances.

When the Levantine tells a story he is extravagant and the facts sound too far fetched simply because he wants to amuse and impress; the listener understands perfectly the intent of the fantasy and they share a good laugh.  The rational westerner gets the impression that the Levantine is not honest because he does not stick to the bare boring facts.  For example, when you wake up someone at seven you tell him “Get up, it is already noon and the daylight is over”; when there is a large gathering we say “The entire town was assembled”.  Jesus said “if your right eye sinned snatched it out; better not your whole body ends up in the eternal fire” or “if someone asks to be clothed give him your robe and underwear too” or “Forgive seventy times seven a day” which drive the holy number seven to an extreme number of holiness; a number that should not be taken to the word but to drive in the message of ready forgiveness.

In the Bibles it is said “After six days” and you wonder starting from which date, which event?  Or it is said “They went up a high mountain” and you want to ask “how high?” and “which mountain?”  If you insist on the height of the mountain he would reply “it was so high it pierced the clouds” The purpose of the story is to entertain and prepare for the punch line.  For example, John the Baptist is not in the mood of cajoling and says to the Pharisees “Sons of vipers, how will you escape the wrath of God? I tell you if God wished he will turn these stones sons of Abraham”

The Levantine is ever ready to swear on his father, his head, his mustaches, and anything that is holy to convey the message of his sincerity.  It is this custom of constant swearing that baffle the westerner and increases his suspicions.  Jesus was aware of this custom and insisted on his disciples never to swear on anything but rather “let your answer be yes, yes or no, no”.  This summoning of Jesus had no effects whatsoever in our Land.

It is important to grasp four characteristics in the Levantine customs: first, every region and every town has its own slang and it is the best proof of your origin. For example, the more Peter denied his knowledge of Jesus the more people were convinced that he was from Galilee. After the battle between the Galaad and the Efrem prisoners were slaughtered because they pronounced “shiboulat” “siboulat”. Second, it is recommended to insist until requests are obtained; for example, Gideon insists on two material miracles from God to believe him; or when Jesus repeats three times “Do you love me Peter?” before he divulges the most important order of “shepherding the flock” of disciples. Third, insinuation is not understood and abhorred and thus, a clear solemn affirmation is demanded. Fourth, the Levantine does not appreciate constraining and transition expressions such as “As I see, or I think that, or it is alleged, or it is possible, and so forth”.  The Levantine verbal expression is of certitude and feeling, compatible to his spiritual and devotional nature.

 

On Business Transactions:

Abraham had no piece of land in Canaan; his clan let their goats and sheep graze in unclaimed lands. As there was a death in the family Abraham resolved to prepare for his burial; he sent a third party to ask Afroun son of Sohar of the tribe of Hath for a small piece of land to bury the dead. Abraham said: “I am a guest in your land. Could you give me a swath so that I may bury what is in front of me?”  Every village had a burying ground facing east and guests, by the custom of hospitality, could be enjoying the same facilities. Afroun replied: “Abraham you are a reverend and I shall bury the deceased in the best of our graves” Abraham had set his mind to settle in Canaan and wanted his own burial ground, thus he asked to buy a piece of land.  Afroun replied: “A land of no more than 400 silver shekels should not be an obstacle” Abraham got the hint and sent the amount.  This polite and diplomatic negotiation is part of the Levant customs thousand of years before Abraham came to Canaan.

On Bread and Salt:

In the Levant, women leaven their dough overnight in clay pottery for the next day baking; the baking lasted a whole day for a week ration. The neighboring families would select a day to using the special oven dug in the ground.  The Jews were ordered to leave Egypt immediately.  They carried their unleavened dough in wooden boxes, as done in Egypt, and had to eat their bread barely leavened.  The shepherds in the fields in the Levant cook their own unleavened bread while at work.

Jesus said in the Lord prayer “Lord, give us our daily bread” The people in the Levant believe that their daily bread is not just from their labor; the Lord had participated from start to finish to offering the daily bread.  I cannot help but offer a current and political rapprochement: the successive US Administrations and the media “talking heads” would like us to believe that whatever prosperity is befalling other States it is simply because of US contributions; on the other hand, whatever calamities and miseries the world is suffering should not be laid on the USA: the USA does not bear any responsibility and should not be blamed.

It is the custom for a guest not to eat until he settles his recriminations with the host; thus bread and salt are the symbol of renewed friendship and loyalty.  The worst enemy is the one who shared your bread and salt and then shifted loyalty without any warning.  People never stepped on crumbs of bread (aysh meaning living); they pick up any bread off the ground, kiss it and then place it above ground level.

            When Gideon gathered his “large army” to fight the Midyanites, God ordered Gideon to select the soldiers that stooped in front of the stream and drank off the palm of their hands.  That was the custom of the noble citizens in the land; the common people knelt and drank directly off the stream.  Thus, Gideon ended up with 300 soldiers who were deemed courageous, sober, and worthy to fight.

On Handicapped persons: 

Handicapped individuals have a hard life in the Levant; they are nicknamed according to their handicaps; up very recently they were hidden from the public.  In Jesus travels handicapped individuals had hard time approaching Jesus; the crowd would prevent them from coming close because handicaps were considered punishment from God.  A handicapped woman got her courage and dared to touch the robe of Jesus and was cured.  Jesus told her: “Woman, it is your faith and not my cloth that cured you. Go in peace” Jesus was alluding to the custom that touching anything holy would cure or satisfy a want.

On Injustice:

Carrying the cross Jesus said “Sisters of Jerusalem, don’t cry over me.  Those who manhandled moist branches what they wouldn’t do with the dry ones?”  If the sacerdotal caste could sentence to death an innocent man then what you, sisters of Jerusalem, expect them to do with you and your children?  You should be starting to cry over your coming miseries and injustices.  Aphorisms on moist things versus dry ones, or bitter versus sweet tasty foods are many in the Levant.

On Animals:

Jesus warned Peter that he would repudiate him three times before the second crow of the coq.  There is a custom in the Levant when guest hear the second crow of the coq to start leaving.  The host has invariably to retort “You guys are mistaken, this is the first crow”. You may search Google for how many times a coq crows per day but in the Levant we maintain that coq crows at sun down, midnight and at dawn.

Jesus said about the surprise visit of death: “Stay awake; you don’t know when the Master of the house will show up; in the evening, at midnight or the last crow of the coq”.  The oriental Christian communities used the nights to pray and watch for the second coming of “Son of God”

Pigs are considered the dirtiest and lowest of animals.  When Jesus chased out the demons off a crazy man then the evil spirit entered pigs that rushed to the lake.  The younger son who asked for his inheritance ended up caring for pigs (the lowest job anyone could get) and could not even eat what the pigs ate though he loved “kharoub” which fills the stomach.

On Wheat Grinding: 

On the theme of sudden death Jesus recount another aphorism of the Land “Two of you are grinding wheat in a quern (hand mill), one is taken away and the other saved”.  It was the custom for two women friends to undertake the boring task of grinding wheat grain in two circular stone querns; a strong woman could do it alone but it is more fun to pass the time when two are chatting away.  Thus, you can never know when your closest friend will die.  Nowadays, in remote areas, the hand mill or “jaroush” is used to convert wheat grains into crushed wheat which is a staple ingredient to many traditional dishes like “tabouli”, “kebeh, and countless varieties.

On Revelations: 

Revelations abound in the Bible to the prophets, Elizabeth, Marie, and many times to Joseph who obeyed and executed the orders promptly.  Revelations are common phenomenon in the Levant.  A family would pay visits to shrines dedicated to a saint for fertility or for kinds of handicaps; the family would stay at the shrine praying and fasting as many nights as necessary until a revelation related to their wishes descends.  The families visit shrines confident that their “demands” would be exhausted.

For example, Hanna, the mother of the Virgin Marie had a revelation that she would be pregnant, so had Elizabeth (Alisabat), the sister of Hanna, who begot John the Baptist, so had Marie who gave birth to Jesus, so did the mother of Melki Sadek, the highest priest of the Land and King of Jerusalem to whom Abraham paid the teethe (tenth of income) as did Isaac and then Jacob, so did the mother of Samuel (Name of El), so had the mother of Jeremiah (Aramia) and countless others.

Those mothers vowed (nazer) their offspring to monasteries that were common in Phoenicia and Galilee.  The offspring who stayed in these monasteries for a large part of their youth were called Nazereen.  Jesus stayed in the monastery of Mount Carmel and administered by the Esseneans, adjacent to the Great Temple, from age 6 until he was in the age of aiding the family earning a living.  That is why Jesus was said to be a Nazarenos or who lived in the region of Galilee of the Nazarenes.  The town of Nazareth did not exist until the second century after Christ and Jesus roamed Lebanon, the ten main cities in Syria and Jordan (Decapolis) while preparing his disciples to spread his message.

On Shepherding and Faith

            Jesus said “I am the good shepherd who is ready to sacrifice for his sheep”. The shepherding was the oldest and most common job in the Levant and people learned leadership, and enjoyed freedom and solitude.  The shepherd, during the extended dry season, would lead his flock “the blessed ones” to the upper lands for grazing by mid March as the sheep or goat gave birth.  The shepherd would carry the new born and the mothers would follow him, confident in her shepherd.  The shepherd would arrange a stockade (hazeera) of stones about 5 feet high and top it with brambles and sleep at the entrance in a makeshift tent with his dog. “The truth is anyone who does not enter the stockade by the entrance is a thief; the shepherd enters from the door and the sheep hear his voice and their names and they go out to graze” because the stockade could be climbed with minor scratches. By mid October, the shepherd dismantles his stockade and moves his flock to lower altitudes where the sheep are horded in a one room basement (mrah) with no windows; Isaiah said: “My residence was dismantled and taken away from me as the shepherd tent”

            Shepherding requires skills in tight passageway amid the orchards that were not usually fenced.  The shepherd had to pay for whatever the sheep ate if he was unable to control his flock; the town people would not let the shepherd cross the village if they could not trust his guiding skills.  The flock trusted the shepherd because he would ward off wolves and hyenas and even follow the scavenger to its lair to retrieve the sheep or part of it and return it to the flock if alive. Jesus said: “A shepherd would leave his flock to go after the lost sheep”. The flock is not afraid of narrow hazardous paths taken by the shepherd “the shadow of death valley” because it trusts its leader.

 

Grape vines:

 

When Jesus mentions “The product of grape vine” is meant wine; though grapes were customarily dried (zabeeb) in abundance.  Kids would always carry handful of raisins in their oversized pockets as sweet and also to bribe other children; when long caravans of camels arrive at the market place, kids would bribe the conductors with raisins for a ride to the wells.  Women would get frustrated because camels drank most of the well and the women had to dip their buckets far deeper.  Grape vines were used as aphorism such as “I am the vine and you are its branches” or “Your wife is like a fecund vine around your house. Your sons like olive trees around your dinner table”.  The Prophet Micah said “They will sit under the vine and the fig tree and nothing will scare them”

The ceremonies of grape pressing by men’ and boys’ feet lasted days and nights until the juices were flowed to special receptacles of stones and clay. The press was made of a large stone vat set up on the roof of the house with a certain incline for the flow of the juice. The settled grape juice (rawook) was drunk by the poor people who could not afford wine “the (poor) pressed and felt thirsty”.  The rawook would then be boiled at various degrees; sour wine was preferred by men but sweet wine needed high boiling temperature because preferred by women. When the juice was destined to prepare molasses “debs” then white clay was added to the grapes before pressing for more efficient filtering of organic components.  Isaiah (Ashaya) said “Why your robe is reddish and your cloth looking as you were pressing grapes?”

Nowadays, the national drink is arak or ouzou in Greece and it is basically the condensation of the boiled grape juice through alembics; it is called “mtalat” when the process of condensation is performed three times for a content 97% alcoholic.

Gideon wanted to avoid paying tax on his wheat harvest.  The grape was not ripe yet and thus, Gideon used the top of his house to beat the wheat where grapes were pressed by feet though it was not yet the season of grape pressing.  He was hoping that the Midyanites would not discover his subterfuge.

 

The Roof Tops:

 

The houses in the Levant used to be of just one large room where the entire family slept and ate in the winter season; the adjacent split room or a basement sheltered the chicken, goats, cows, or donkey.  The rest of the dry seasons that extended for over 7 months the main meeting place was the roof top; a makeshift tent of dangling grape vines and dry branches, and called “alyyeh”.  The roof was built with supporting tree trunks at three feet intervals and cross branches with no gaps and then 12 inches of dirt rolled over by a cylindrical stone at every season.  Official announcements or the arrival of caravans or any kind of major warnings such as the voices of field keepers (natour) were done by climbing a roof. Jesus advised his disciple to announce the Good News from the roof tops so that every one should hear the message clear and sound; that is what Peter did.  Families would go up to the roof tops to pray and cry and the new comer Hebrews didn’t like this custom of the Land.

When a paraplegic was dangled from a roof top for Jesus to heal the friends dug out the dirt and removed a few branches and made enough space (kofaa) then placed the sick man on a blanket with the four corners attached to a rope.

           

            At the Last Supper, Jesus and his disciples are eating on the roof top of a house, the “alyyat”; the family gathers in that shed during the hot seasons that extend for seven months from Mid May to mid September. Jesus and the disciples are sitting in a circle around several large platters of various dishes; everyone extends his hand to dip his piece of bread in the platter of his liking; there are no spoons or forks.  The scene is not as represented by Leonardo Da Vinci in the customs of Florence.  A server pour the wine in a single cup, starting by the most ranked in the gathering.  Before drinking the cup in one shot the guest wishes long life to his friends and ask them to remember him if he is about to leave them for an extended trip; then he selects the next guest to drink and the server pour wine for the selected person and in the same single cup. After supper, the cup is passed around and everyone takes just a sip.  Jesus said “I longed so much to eat this supper with you before I suffer”

            Jesus said: “The first one to dip his bread in my platter will deliver me tonight” was confusing to the disciples because they all dipped in Jesus’ platter one time or another. Judas was always the second in command and must have arranged to have his favorite platter close to him and Jesus for easy access; thus, Judas was the most plausible one to first dip his bread in Jesus platter. Young John loved Jesus and expressed his feeling as to the customs of the Levant by reclining his head on Jesus’ shoulder.  Jesus adhered to the customs of eating supper and his salutes about eating his flesh or drinking his blood in remembrance of him had a spiritual undertone and suggesting that he was to leave his disciples for good.  Jesus dipped a piece of bread in a platter and specifically offered it to Judas as a symbol of friendship no matter what is in Judas’ heart and mind. Jesus presented the box of money to Judas, the treasurer, as a sign that nothing is changed in Jesus faith to Judas loyalty in matter of financial transactions. Anyway, Judas was from a rich family and didn’t need small changes.

            In the garden of Gethsemane Jesus expresses his feelings of sorrows and pains as a Levantine; he lets his feelings pour out and wants his closest friends to share his feelings.  Three times he invites Peter and the sons of Zebedeh to keep the wake with him because “my soul is sad to death”.  Jesus was praying with such earnestness that his “sweating was of blood”. Jesus had no choice but to obey his father and urged God “Father, if it were possible to take away this biter cup, but it is not as I wish but as you want”

            Judas approached Jesus in the garden of Gethsemane and kissed him several times on the cheeks. Judas was thus telling Jesus, according to the Levant customs, that as of this instant they are on a par in ranks and that Judas decided that he no longer considers Jesus as the Messiah. Some one of a lower rank would shake hands and fake to kiss the right hand and the higher ranked person would fake a kiss on the cheek. Judas was using a custom for greetings that could also be used as a sign for the soldiers to get hold of the leader.

 

On Obeying Parents:

 

Obeying parents is not just a filial feeling in the Levant but a religious duty.  The command is “Obey your mother and father” and God punished Adam for simply disobeying him, period.  The story of Luc when Jesus, aged 12 then, was found discussing among the priests in the Temple as the clan went on pilgrimage is revealing. Jesus had priority of which parents to obey first: he reminded his parents that he has a duty to obey his God El first.  In the Levant, no family starts or leaves on a trip before counting and making sure of the presence of all the members of the family.  After the count, Jesus decided to return to the Temple. After the count, his family didn’t worry about Jesus because he was supposed to be amid the wider clan of relatives and because the Great Temple on Mount Carmel (not Jerusalem) was a familiar visiting place and no more than half a day walk to “Bethlehem of Tyr or Efrateh” where they lived, on the east side of Mount Carmel in Upper Galilee.  In none of the parables you find the eldest son depicted as the villain or disrespectful of traditions.  Eldest sons represent the fathers and the continuation of customs.

 

On Kingdom of Heaven

 

In the Levant we understand intuitively the figures of speech and parables that the West has hard time to comprehend; we understand and readily accept the meaning though it takes a life time to assimilate the true meaning.  Jesus said “The Kingdom of Heaven is like a person who is convinced that there is a treasure hidden in a piece of land. He gathers all his saving a buy the land” The predicators in the West would like to interpret this sentence as a gold or silver mine in the land that need to be excavated and they go at great length into legal terms to differentiate among the words “hidden and buried”.  The customs in our Land was to bury the jar of saved gold and silver coins in the garden or an unclaimed piece of land because the habitat was small (barely one large room where the entire household sleep and eat in) and could not sustain serious hiding places.  Tribes would hide their treasure in the desert before waging a battle and many would never survive to dig up their treasures.

            Thus, the individual who bought the land, if he were lucky would have to dig up most of the land anyway to find the jar of treasure.  The meaning is in order to reach the Kingdom of Heaven you would have to go through the same process of fulfilling a dream by investing money, time, and effort most of your life. Consequently, faith is a good starting point to sustain the duration of the long haul but it is not enough if you lack charity in your heart; you have to learn to care and love and support your brothers and neighbors. It is a hard and long endeavor to pass through the “hole of the needle“

            For example, many predicators in the west tried their best to explain the concept of “a hole in a needle” when Jesus said “It is easier for a camel to go through the hole of a needle than a rich person to go to heaven”.  The predicators in the west invented a more plausible and palatable explanation by saying that “the hole in the needle” was the small door in the huge gate reserved for the passage of individual; they said that a camel could pass through if not loaded with baggage; another nice figure of speech though not correct. In the languages of the Land, Arabic, Aramaic, or Hebrew the names of the small doors in gates were never called by anything referring to needle. The language in the Levant is extravagant for describing the almost impossible tasks that require perseverance and ingenuity.

 

            Jesus goes on: “Kingdom of heaven is like a land that was sawn with good grains of wheat.  At night, an enemy comes and saw “zouan” (a grain that resembles wheat but causes pain, dizziness, and suffering for many days when mixed with wheat grains; it is mostly used to feed chicken).  The cultivators (slaves) asked the master permission to sort out and pull out the “zouan” from the field. The master said that it is useless since the whole field is ruined” In dire periods of famine many would mix “zouan” with wheat to make profit regardless of the consequences.  The honest master would not take the chance of being perceived as a fraud if his good grain was inadvertently adulterated with “zouan”.

            In another verse, Jesus told the servants to patiently and meticulously remove the “zouan” from the wheat then gather around a bonfire to burn the “zouan”

 

            The same idea relates with leaven that was saved in a bag of wheat in order not to rot quickly; in another verse in order to leaven the entire bag of wheat flour.  In ancient periods, people would eat unleavened bread because it was very hard and difficult to keep usable leaven in hot and desert regions.  Thus, leaven had the bad connotation of spoilage agent, such as when Jesus warned his disciples “Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees” but the disciples didn’t understand this figure of speech: they lived at an advanced and urban period when leaven was no longer associated with spoilage but as a good catalyst.  Consequently, the parable of Jesus “Kingdom of Heaven is like a leaven that a woman hide in three bags of wheat flour until all the bags were leavened and ready to bake refers to the good use of small quantities to affect large lots.  Thus, a term could be used to convey contradictory meaning if we are not conversant with the customs and period of the saying.  In the Levant, cultivators believe that “zouan” will grow among wheat no mater how careful we proceed in sawing fields. Consequently, it is advisable to rotate the field to grow other kinds of harvests in order to have the opportunity to pull out all the “zouan” that spoiled the field for later wheat harvests.

           

 

            Jesus said “The Kingdom of Heaven is like a woman who had misplaced one of her ten coins.  She searches all nights and all days (when the husband is not home), she searches in every nook and cranny and she sweep the floor until she finds the missing coin.  Then this woman would call up her neighboring women friends to join her and celebrate” (Most of the time they spend more on these gathering than what the coin was worth).  People worked hard to earn a coin and the man of the house would invariable express his displeasure for a missing coin and every women had gone through the same experience many times in their lives and it was a real occasion for women to gather, recount, and recall their daily troubles.  There are times for anxiety and relentless searches and times for relaxation and sharing.  There are moments for prioritizing our quests and leaving many tasks undone to focus on an urgent one, such as saving our soul in order not to anger our Lord.  This story is almost identical in meaning as the shepherd who leaves 99 head of sheep grazing unattended in order to find the lost one.

 

On Women:

 

            Regardless of exterior behaviors of “non-polite” communication with women, men have utmost respect and considerations for their wives and sisters and girls. Inside the homes the couples are at par in responsibilities and duties if not biased toward the wives; “When there is love affectation is redundant”.  In that spirit, it is the good intensions that count and not the actual behaviors.  The Levantine regards the expressions “If you please”, or “be kind enough” are superfluous because love and respect are natural and come with the territory.  This behavior is compatible with the simple and rough daily living; houses are simply furnished with the basic necessities and the entire family members sleep and eat in one room or two; there are no exclusive rooms or quarters for the grown ups; and thus privacy is not a priority.

            The tradition of nomadic tribes raiding sedentary affluent villages and taking women captives heightened the protective customs in the Levant and restricted women’s work within the villages.   Women were restrained from showing off and retorting vehemently in gatherings of men.   

            The attitude of men of adopting the two extreme behaviors of sanctifying women (horma) and occasional “contempt” might convey a feeling of disdain but it is basically a childish behavior coupled with lack of a cultural life that the harsh demands for survival do not reserve time for “luxury”.  The Hebraic laws considered women with no soul and thus could be transacted as chattel; this is not the case for the rest of the people of the Land; and thus this huge cultural difference between the Hebrew Mosaic traditions and the traditions in the Levant.

 

“Thus spoken God; they will come carrying the little girls over the shoulders.  Kings will be your vassals and queens will nurse you”  The custom of carrying kid girls over shoulders is widely practiced in the Levant; mother resumes her daily tasks while the kid girls sit on their shoulders while getting a hold on the head. The prophet Isaiah (Ashaya) speaks in imageries what the “noble” class in the Levant expects the common people to practice in their presence.

New Born were wrapped like mummies; first they are washed with lukewarm water and their bodies rubbed with salt and then scented before a square piece of cloth join their arms by the side of the body and the legs stretched.  An unwanted baby or when someone is cursed the maxim says “You were not rubbed with salt when you were born”

 

On Feet:

Feet were considered dirty because people went barefoot or wearing thongs at best. The same is true when John the Baptist said about the coming Messiah “I will be most honored if he permit me to untie his shoe lace” because feet were considered dirty parts of the body and stooping near feet is not acceptable and thus, the custom of sitting by the feet of a nobility is a mark of homage bestowed on him.  When the sister of Martha, Mary of Magdala, pours expensive perfumes on Jesus’ feet and rubbed them with her hair she was expressing her complete humiliation and attesting to the Messiah status of Jesus.

 

Note 1: The people in the Levant are people of faith; they refrain from rationally structuring their religion into dogma.  The early Christian communities relied on the custom of brotherhood and faith in the community. It is only when Christian communities were established in Greece and Rome that structuring got underway.  Hundreds of Christian sects mushroomed in the Levant according to a few alterations in the re-structuring of the dogma that spanned into political and self autonomous sects.  After the conclave of Nicee (Turkey) in 325, during the pagan Emperor Constantine, the Church got highly structured and hierarchical; the pagan ceremonies, symbols, and pageantry were introduced to win over the pagans who were in the majority.  Since then, persecution of the “heretic” Christian sects started and is still alive into modern time.

 

Note 2:  I am no theologian, and frankly, I don’t feel hot for any structured and formalized religions.  I am a guy who is appalled by sects abusing religion for political ends, for institutional profit, and for personal aggrandizement.  Occasionally, a few books of historical nature in matter of religion drop into my hands and they expose a few lethal fallacies; I have no choice but to react, expose the confusion related to abstract concepts out of their historical, geographical, and cultural context.  I cannot withstand sects that abolish individual reflection for the benefit of the “collectivity” or their close knit communities. I disseminate what my personal reflections feel right to inform and educate.

Monday, March 30, 2009

Faith Awakened

Faith Awakened

by Grace Bridges

ISBN-13: 9781430311119 (Trade Paperback)

180pages

Pub. Date: October 2007

Publisher: Lulu.com

The greatest lapses in judgement can occur when high ranking government officials seek to rule over earth’s inhabitants with absolute power and control. It was not nuclear, but it was powerful enough to wipe out most of the millions who inhabited planet Earth.  Man has brought about his own demise by an engineered virus. A deadly plague that spreads across the planet like the wind. Curiously enough, there are a handful of survivors who live on untouched by the deadly microscopic man-killer. In the midst of this mind numbing government control, a few select people have been allowed to continue on with scientific exploration, such as cryogenic sleep chambers. Will these machines prove to be the salvation of the remnant?

“The jabbing pain in my head disappeared as the cold swept over my body, and I floated away contentedly in a sea of blackness to a better world. A world of Faith.”

Out of the handful of survivors, two main characters emerge, Faith and Mariah, but are their stories real, or are they just a fantasy? Will they take that journey alone or will they somehow find each other, and will the God of all the universe go with them into that dimension, or it will be a cold, dark and lonely road that they will forever  travel on their own?

Faith Awakened, paints a picture of a future time that we may one day face if left to our own devices. Grace Bridges has found a clever way to put a new spin on an end time story, one that blends a Biblical theme with the sci-fi genre. This story will grab you from the first page and compel you to read on until you have finished the book. Even then, the story will stay with you and give you pause to think. —Grace Lightfoot, Associate Editor

Posted in March 2009 (37 posts)

215.  Persia’s Safavide Empire (1501-1750 AC) (Part 5, March 2, 2009)

 

216.  Dreaming has a Memory of its own (March 2, 2009)

 

217.  Nietzsche: “God is dead” (Part 3, March 3, 2009)

 

218.  “Routine”: Not such a bad Schedule (March 5, 2009)

 

219.  Coelho’s mountain climbing: None of Guidelines were never followed (March 5, 2009)

 

220.  Nietzsche’s “Christianity is a carbon copy of Judaism” (Part 5, March 6, 2009)

 

221.  Bi-Weekly report (#14) on the Middle East and Lebanon (March 7, 2009)

 

222.  Free Style “Poetry”: The Lebanese kind (March 7, 2009)

 

223.  Drama: Here are the Choices (March 9, 2009)

 

224.  Power: No Longer a Point of View (March 9, 2009)

 

225.  A Happy Meal (March 10, 2009)

 

226.  Rituals of Human Sacrifices (March 10, 2009)

 

227.  The Century of Islam (March 11, 2009)

 

228.  Should Palestinian Hamas Recognize Israel?  (March 12, 2009)

 

229.  False Prophets (March 12, 2009)

 

230.  The Syrian Christ (March 13, 2009)

 

231.  The Last Gorilla: The Confederation Branch (Short Story, Part 1) (March 14, 2005)

232.  The Last Gorilla: The Environmental Branch (Short Story, Part 2) (March 14, 2005)

 

233.   As of the Bible: Customs in the Levant, part 1.  (March 14, 2009)

 

234.   As of the Bible: Customs in the Levant, part 2.  (March 15, 2009)

235.  “Souvenirs” (March 16, 2009)

 

236.  The Virgin Mary is from the town of Qana in Lebanon; Book Review; (March 17, 2009)

 

237.  The Jar of Glue (March 17, 2009)

 

238. Who are the Israelites?  From Abraham to the Macabe Kingdom (Chapter one); (March 19, 2009)

 

239.  Who are the Israelites?  Origins of Jesus Christ; Chapter two, (March 20, 2009)

 

240.  The Last Supper: Customs in the Levant; Chapter 3.  (March 22, 2009)

 

241.  Customs in the Levant: Figures of speech in the Bibles (March 24, 2009)

 

242.  The kid that kept asking questions (March 24, 2009)

 

243.  I left my scent in every corner (March 24, 2009)

 

244.  The Jante Law: Mediocrity is King (March 24, 2009)

 

245.  Lethal Spiritual Myths (March 25, 2009)

 

246.  The Bibles: Customs in the Near East (Part 5, March 25, 2009)

 

247.  The Bibles: A Repository of the Customs in the Near East (March 26, 2009)        

248.  “An Urban Detour” by Rania Sassine (Book Review, March 25, 2009)

 

249.  “As a flowing River” by Paulo Coelho (Book Review, March 26, 2009)

 

250.  No more Caches for Fiscal Evaders (March 27, 2009)

 

251.  Siesta: Try it (March 27, 2009)

 

252. Nietzsche: The Philosopher of Life (March 28, 2009)

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Review: Barry Miles - The Beatles Phenomenon

Below is a review I wrote of The Beatles Phenomenon by Barry Miles from the April issue of Record Collector.

Don’t know anything about The Beatles? You will now

In a similar vein to 2000’s Beatles Anthology, this hefty paperback is a combination of detailed biography, photo album, sheet music and oral history (with quotes from ex- Quarry Men, the band’s Hamburg cleaning lady and the man who cut the first mop-top). The story has been told countless times before, not least by Miles, author of official Macca biography Many Years From Now and “manager” of the short-lived Zapple label, but rarely with this much detail.

Though comparing The Beatles’ split to an expensive, public divorce is a tad unfortunate given Paul McCartney’s recent past, Miles’ exhaustive research and recollections will please even the most ultra-curious Beatles fan. A gigography covers wedding receptions (George Harrison’s brother’s), TV auditions as The Silver Beatles and stints backing poets and strippers, to the American stadium tours, plus day-by-day accounts of every studio session. The rarely-seen photos are excellent, even if some glossy paper would have done them more justice: blurry live shots from Hamburg and the Cavern; backstage at Morecambe & Wise; out and about in Liverpool; Harrison among the 300,000 cards he received for his 21st birthday and a teenage Ringo Starr as sulky, big-quiffed teddy boy.

Out: now, Publisher: Omnibus

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Book Review: Ideological and Jurisprudential Frontiers of Islam

Ayatollah Mohsen Araki

This is an interesting book of questions sent to and answered by Ayatollah Mohsen Araki. He answers all of the jurisprudential questions in accordance to the views of Sayyid Ali Khamenei and Imam Khomeini.

First I want to introduce Ayatollah Mohsen Araki. He is a prominent Islamic scholar being a student of Ayatollah Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr. He was the official representative of Sayyid Ali Khamenei (the supreme leader) in England for a number of years, ending in 2004.

There are numerous questions on numerous topics including Islamic ideology and practical laws. The subjects of the practical laws are taharah, prayer, fasting, khums, marriage, divorce, forbidden sources of income, eating and drinking, and miscellaneous rulings. It is a must for those who perform taqlid to Sayyid Ali Khamenei.

The one criticism that I have of the book is that the translation is not the best. The English could be improved. It was translated by Ayatollah Araki’s son-in-law Hujjatul Islam Hayder Shriazi. May Allah bless him for his efforts, but it would be a great idea to have it edited and republished.

Despite the English I would definitely recommend this book to all Muslims, even those who do not perform taqleed to Sayyid Ali Khamenei, and especially I would recommend it to those who do perform taqleed to him. The answers given to ideological questions are deep and everyone can benefit from them.

Details of the Book:

Ideological And Jurisprudential Frontiers of Islam

Printed in Great Britain, 1999

Copyright - Islamic Centre England - London

ISBN 1 900560 50 x

Friday, March 27, 2009

a crazy week of caffeine, blizzard warnings, love and demons

This week (or maybe just the caffeine I’ve ingested today) is making my head spin!  There’s not even really that much going on, at least not outside of my head.  Inside of my head, however, this week has had its fair share of thinking and processing and working way too hard.   Weeks like this can take a toll on a person, that’s for sure. 

 

Work was called off due to the blizzard warning today (seriously.   a blizzard warning.)  Before learning that the office would be closing, I stopped by the library to pick up some reading material (in case the electricity happens to go out~ so I’d have something to do while snuggling under blankets with my puppies).  I picked up three things off of my reading list, and then headed to work.  After that, I had lunch with an amazing woman, and headed home.   

 

My afternoon goal was to finish reading “Of Love and Other Demons” by Gabriel Garcia Marquez.  

This is the third book I’ve read by Marquez, and like the others, it did not fail to captivate me.  I will admit that at times I was tempted to skim over a paragraph or two.  I resolved to read every word and was not disappointed.   

 

I hope everyone stays warm!  

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Amy Silverstein's "Sick Girl"--A Memoir That Shows the Price Paid for a Life-Giving Heart Transplant

Amy Silverstein’s Sick Girl is the amazing memoir of a long-term heart transplant survivor. Silverstein lays bare her experience as a 24-year old struck by heart failure in the prime of her life. In the ensuring 2 decades, she learns (or manages?) to live with the heart transplant that both saved her life and made her life so difficult. During these years, Scott, her boyfriend and then husband remains a constant source of love and support.

Silverstein’s writing is crisply honest and tightly fluid, at times sarcastic and funny. Without melodrama, she narrates vignettes from her life illustrating fears, tantrums, relationships, strength, weakness, and  frustration. We see how she navigated the medical maelstrom of her condition and learned to be a patient who takes charge of difficult decisions. Silverstein is eminently grateful for the transplant—what she ably struggles with is the high toll the anti-rejection medications take on her body, mind, and her quality of life.

This is the true face of heart transplant not the Hallmark version. There are no heroes or villains, just human beings who react in their roles as family, doctors, nurses, and friends—sometimes they are helpful, sometimes they are not. Silverstein is a survivor who endures what she must for herself and her loved ones because the alternative is darkness, which can wait. I highly recommended it.

Amy Silverstein begins “Pre-Game” the prologue chapter of Sick Girl with,

As I stand here counting out three pairs of underwear and four pairs of socks, I think of the little boy who will reach into his suitcase and find them waiting there for him—as if by magic—along with everything else he might need for this weekend. I thank the slow passage of time for keeping this son of mine young enough still to see the world as a seamless sleight of hand: a quarter behind the ear, the tooth fairy’s dollar, a perfectly packed bag that appears out of nowhere. He doesn’t yet need to know the trickery behind the wonders that come his way. He doesn’t need to know how hard it is for his mother to stand here packing this bag: how tired she feels. How sick.

Today I create an illusion with a suitcase. On another day, perhaps, I might draw upon my famous French toast. I am the mother behind the curtain, after all. My son is my constant audience.

And thank goodness my hand is still quicker than his eye. I’ll be sure to pack a book and a deck of cards, grape-scented kids’ shampoo and a rain poncho—just in case. I will think of everything so this ten-year-old boy will be free to think of nothing: not my life expectancy, which ran out eighth years ago, nor the handful of big-gun medicines I took this morning that forced me to the floor, a mommy-ball of nausea curled up on a damp bathroom rug. No, there will not be any trace of my heart transplant in the suitcase I pack for my son today.

I’m one hell of a great magician. [...]

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Book Review: Johnny Be Good by Paige Toon

If your boss was the hottest rock star on the planet, would you mix business with pleasure? I’m Meg Stiles. This is my leaving party. And that song we’re making a mockery of? That’s written by one of the biggest rock stars in the world. And I’m moving in with him tomorrow. Seriously! I am not even joking. Well, maybe I’m misleading you a little bit. You see, I haven’t actually met him yet …No, I’m not a stalker. I’m his new PA. His Personal Assistant. And I am off to La-La Land. Los Angeles. The City of Angels - whatever you want to call it - and I can’t bloody believe it! Celebrity PA to wild boy of rock Johnny Jefferson, Meg’s glam new life in sun-drenched LA is a whirlwind of showbiz parties and backstage passes. Cool, calm Christian, in town to write his famous friend’s biography, helps keep Meg’s feet firmly on the ground. But with Johnny’s piercing green eyes and a body Brad Pitt would kill for, how long will it be before she’s swept right off them again?



Read my review underneath

After reading a review of Paige’s first novel, Lucy in the Sky, in Heat magazine I thought it sounded great so got hold of a copy and absolutely loved it so I couldn’t wait when I read about Paige’s second novel and I wasn’t disappointed…

Meg is off to Los Angeles to be CPA (Celebrity PA) to Johnny Jefferson, the hottest rockstar on the planet. She tells herself she will not fall for him but ultimately does. We follow her as she tries to figure out her feelings for Johnny and we constantly wonder if they will or if they won’t get together. Also in the mix is Christian, Johnny’s best friend and writer of his auto-biography, he helps to keep Meg’s feet on the ground.

It was a fabulous read and, if any of it is true, it shows a lot about what goes on in the world of a rockstar, the drinking and the drugs. Johnny was a good, but flawed, character and I kept hoping he would wake up and smell the coffee. All the minor characters were great; Davey, Santiago, Kitty, Rosa (I loved Rosa).

I think the only disappointment, and it is minor, was the ending. It left me feeling a bit… “huh?” I’m hopeful of a sequel, or even a mention in Chasing Daisy (the way we heard about Lucy from Lucy in the Sky in this one).

In the end I did love the book and the epilogue was only a minor minor disappointment. I whizzed throught the book and it was a real page-turner.

As Trashionista do I will rate all books out of 5.

Rating: 5/5

[book reviews] sciences-sociales_25/03/2009

(source: Library Journal, 15/03/2009)

Economics

Altucher, James. The Forever Porfolio: How To Pick Stocks That You Can Hold for the Long Run. Portfolio. 2008. c.256p. ISBN 978-1-59184-211-8. $27.95. BUS

Altucher, founder of the Stockpickr.com social networking web site for investing, shows how to find stocks that should benefit from irresistible multidecade demographic trends. He singles out the Barnes Group, for instance, because its business of producing parts for railroads should be positively impacted by rail growth. Altucher also says individuals should seek out and emulate the investments made by successful professionals and piggyback onto their research. If Warren Buffett has been buying stock in railroads like Burlington Northern, then, says Altucher, so should you. The irreverent Altucher doesn’t mind poking holes in cherished beliefs, as when he says he would rather give his children money to start successful businesses than spend it on college, which might not be economically beneficial. He also recounts some of the lessons he learned from his investing and business successes and, most insightfully, his failures. All in all, Altucher makes good investing and life points that would benefit most readers, especially young professionals.—Lawrence Maxted, Gannon Univ. Lib., Erie, PA

Goleman, Daniel. Ecological Intelligence: How Knowing the Hidden Impacts of What We Buy Can Change Everything. Doubleday. Apr. 2009. c.275p. index. ISBN 978-0-385-52782-8. $26. BUS

Former New York Times columnist Goleman (Emotional Intelligence) contends that to address environmental challenges, we must rethink our industrial legacy, reform manufacturing and commerce, and improve our collective ecological footprint. In essence, he asserts that collective consumerism is central to environmental action. He discusses the process of life-cycle analysis to determine a product’s environmental impact but maintains it does not go far enough. He persuasively argues that radical transparency—which includes environmental, social, biological, and worker safety and health impacts—will better enable consumers to make decisions based on what matters most to them. Goleman’s discussion of individual shopping habits is particularly interesting, including the need to be aware of superficial service and product claims—”greenwashing.” Although individual decisions are important, he asserts that group action and institutions can create market pressure to shift to sustainable practices and that digital tools can play an effective role in shaping collective awareness and creating coordinated action. Recommended for readers interested in business or environmental issues. [For more on business and the environment, see Robert Eagan's collection development article, "The Green Capitalist," LJ 2/1/09, p. 37-39.—Ed.]—Robin K. Dillow, Rotary International, Lincolnwood, IL

Political Science

Majid, Anouar. We Are All Moors: Ending Centuries of Crusades Against Muslims and Other Minorities. Univ. of Minnesota. Apr. 2009. c.240p. index. ISBN 978-0-8166-6079-7. $24.95. INT AFFAIRS

Majid, an unorthodox professor of English (Univ. of New England; A Call for Heresy) has now written an alternative history of European xenophobia that will stimulate and provoke readers across the political spectrum. The idea that Jews and Muslims share in the indignity of anti-Semitism has been expounded before—Majid relies on works by Gil Anidjar (e.g., The Jew, The Arab) as well as Allan Harris Cutler and Helen E. Cutler’s The Jew as Ally of the Muslim: Medieval Roots of Anti-Semitism, but Majid further broadens the image of the “Moor” to a general metaphor of presumed racial inferiority and troublesome incompatibility. Nimbly stringing together a variety of sources, symbolic associations, and historical parallels, Majid proposes that current American and European anti-immigrant campaigns are culturally descended from medieval Christian crusades against the dark-skinned, non-Christian, culturally perverse “Moor.” This work will generate criticism and conversation; it will be taken up by intellectual reading clubs as well as graduate seminars and should be made available to all academic audiences as well as informed lay readers.—Lisa Klopfer, Eastern Michigan Univ., Ypsilanti

Peters, Gretchen. Seeds of Terror: Heroin and the Financing of the Taliban’s and al Qaeda’s Master Plans. Thomas Dunne Bks: St. Martin’s. May 2009. c.320p. photogs. bibliog. index. ISBN 978-0-312-37927-8. $25.95. INT AFFAIRS

Peters, a former AP and ABC News journalist, presents a meticulous firsthand account of her experiences investigating the role of heroin production and distribution in Afghanistan and the surrounding countries and the reluctance of the U.S. government to address the issue. Covering key players, such as Osama bin Laden, Mullah Omar, and Benazir Bhutto, Peters highlights this lesser-known Afghani product of war and government instability, one that is hard to track and harder to stop. Hers is a tale of how money from opium brought the Taliban back from the brink of extinction and how their joining with al Qaeda has turned Afghanistan into “the world’s first fully fledged narco-terror state.” Her detailed notes and bibliography assist in referencing information; however, general readers would have been better served by the inclusion of maps and a glossary of names/places/acronyms. Recommended for informed audiences. (Photographs not seen.)—Jenny Seftas, Southwest Florida Coll., Fort Myers, FL

Social Sciences

Coles, Roberta L. The Best Kept Secret: Single Black Fathers. Rowman & Littlefield. Mar. 2009. c.192p. index. ISBN 978-0-7425-6425-1. $34.95. SOC SCI

Studies of black fatherhood have focused largely on the absence of or problems with black fathers, overlooking those fathers who, in fact, take sole care of their children. Ironically, then, absent black fathers are present everywhere, in the literature and popular consciousness, while present black fathers are effectively absent, writes Coles. Coles (social & cultural sciences, Marquette Univ.), an expert on families and race, makes a major contribution to the literature on single black custodial fathers. Her study is exploratory and descriptive, offering an examination of the meaning of fatherhood held by the 20 single black custodial fathers she interviewed. Although her findings cannot be generalized (her study does not claim to be representative), her work offers a rich picture of fatherhood embodied by the fathers she interviewed. She discusses themes such as possible differences between raising daughters and sons, getting parenting advice, and talking about racial discrimination with one’s children. An important book that gets this best-kept secret out in the open.—Karen Okamoto, John Jay Coll. Lib., NY

Cullen, Dave. Columbine. Twelve: Hachette. Apr. 2009. c.432p. bibliog. index. ISBN 978-0-446-54693-5. $26.99. SOC SCI

The tenth anniversary of the Columbine tragedy has brought several new books with new information about the school shootings. Cullen, a journalist who was there to cover the story on April 20, 1999, has been researching this event ever since and offers eyewitness testimony, survivor interviews, writings from both Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, and police reports. (He documents his sources at the end of his text.) Any book about this tragedy can be hard to read, and Cullen’s detailed account of the gruesome killings and suicides is no exception. Cullen’s style can also make the book hard going, as he skips back and forth through time and among different people involved in the event and occasionally repeats himself. In the end, however, Cullen clarifies a lot of misconceptions that evolved soon after the tragedy and provides new insights into why it occurred, which makes the book definitely worth reading despite the disjointed narrative.—Terry Christner, Hutchinson P.L., KS

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Bone Crossed by Patricia Briggs

By day, Mercy is a car mechanic in the sprawling Tri-Cities of Eastern Washington.  By night, she explores her preternatural side.  As a shapeshifter with some unique talents, Mercy has often found herself having to maintain a tenuous harmony between the human and the not so human.  This time she may get more than she bargained for.

Marsilia, the local Vampire Queen, has learned that Mercy crossed her by slaying a member of her clan - and she’s out for blood.  But since Mercy is protected from direct reprisal by the werewolf pack (and her close relationship with its sexy alpha), it won’t be Mercy’s blood Marsilia is after.

It’ll be her friends’.

Bone Crossed is the fourth book in the Mercy Thompson series and the first to be published in hardcover.  I would not suggest starting with this book if you have never read the series before.

Bone Crossed necessarily deals with the repercussions of Mercy’s rape at the end of Iron Kissed.  Mercy is refusing to allow what happened to shape her life.  She doesn’t want to be a victim and feels angry when she has panic attacks.  Mercy doesn’t want to allow herself time to heal.  Luckily, she has people in her life who gently make her deal with her feelings and help her though the panic attacks.

I loved the interactions between Mercy and Adam, each trusting the other.  Despite being an Alpha, Adam has the self-control to let Mercy handle her problems, he will only help if she is unable to solve them.  Mercy understands Adam enough that she is not angry at him when, out of frantic concern and desperation, he does something that will permanently affect her, without her consent.

There is a lot going on in Bone Crossed, and the main mystery is only part of that.  A very intriging part however!  An old college friend asks for Mercy’s help in dealing with a ghost her son says he can see.  To reduce the danger to her friends from Marsilia, Mercy decides to go out of town and help her friend.  I loved the son, Chad, and his relief when Mercy says she can see the ghost.  It is (of course) more than a just a simple ghost.

While Mercy is out of the town the werewolves are negociating peace with Marsilia.  It was good to see the werewolves deal from their own position of power, and that unlike some other series, Mercy is not the only person who can solve a problem.

Bone Crossed was a wonderful installment in one of my favourite series.  Patricia Briggs has said that the next book, Silver Borne, will be out in Feb 2010, and will focus on Samuel.

Monday, March 23, 2009

Book Launch at ISRAEL'S The Judaica Centre March 25, 2009

ISRAEL’S The Judaica Centre presents the book launch of Living Legacies:

A collection of inspirational stories by contemporary Canadian Jewish women.

Date: March 25, 2009

Time: 7:30 PM

Place: ISRAEL’S The Judaica Centre

870 Eglinton Ave West, Toronto

Meet and greet the authors:

  • Dr. Renate Krakauer
  •  Dr. Karen Mock
  •  Tilda Shalof 
  •  Judith Wiley

Free admission: Kosher refreshments served.

RSVP: liz_pearl@sympatico.ca or abitnun@israelsjudaica.com

The Last Supper: Customs in the Levant; Chapter 3

The Last Supper: Customs in the Levant; Chapter 3.  (March 22, 2009)

 

            Obeying parents is not just a filial feeling in the Levant but a religious duty.  The command is “Obey your mother and father” and God punished Adam for simply disobeying him, period.  The story of Luc when Jesus, aged 12 then, was found discussing among the priests in the Temple as the clan went on pilgrimage is revealing. Jesus had priority of which parents to obey first: he reminded his parents that he has a duty to obey his God El first.  In the Levant, no family starts or leaves on a trip before counting and making sure of the presence of all the members of the family.  After the count, Jesus decided to return to the Temple. After the count, his family didn’t worry about Jesus because he was supposed to be amid the wider clan of relatives and because the Great Temple on Mount Carmel (not Jerusalem) was a familiar visiting place and no more than half a day walk to “Bethlehem Efrateh” where they lived, on the east side of Mount Carmel in Upper Galilee.

 

            At the Last Supper, Jesus and his disciples are eating on the roof of a house.  In the Levant, most roofs have a grapevine dangling over an open shed called “alyyat”; the family gathers in that shed during the hot seasons that extend for seven months from Mid May to mid September. Jesus and the disciples are sitting in a circle around several large platters of various dishes; everyone extends his hand to dip his piece of bread in the platter of his liking; there are no spoons or forks.  The scene is not as represented by Leonardo Da Vinci in the customs of Florence.  A server pour the wine in a single cup, starting by the most ranked in the gathering.  Before drinking the cup in one shot the guest wishes long life to his friends and ask them to remember him if he is about to leave them for an extended trip; then he selects the next guest to drink and the server pour wine for the selected person and in the same single cup. After supper, the cup is passed around and everyone takes just a sip.  Jesus said “I longed so much to eat this supper with you before I suffer”

            Jesus said: “The first one to dip his bread in my platter will deliver me tonight” was confusing to the disciples because they all dipped in Jesus’ platter one time or another. Judas was always the second in command and must have arranged to have his favorite platter close to him and Jesus for easy access; thus, Judas was the most plausible one to first dip his bread in Jesus platter. Young John loved Jesus and expressed his feeling as to the customs of the Levant by reclining his head on Jesus’ shoulder.  Jesus adhered to the customs of eating supper and his salutes about eating his flesh or drinking his blood in remembrance of him had a spiritual undertone and suggesting that he was to leave his disciples for good.  Jesus dipped a piece of bread in a platter and specifically offered it to Judas as a symbol of friendship no matter what is in Judas’ heart and mind. Jesus presented the box of money to Judas, the treasurer, as a sign that nothing is changed in Jesus faith to Judas loyalty in matter of financial transactions. Anyway, Judas was from a rich family and didn’t need small changes.

            In the garden of Gethsemane Jesus expresses his feelings of sorrows and pains as a Levantine; he lets his feelings pour out and wants his closest friends to share his feelings.  Three times he invites Peter and the sons of Zebedeh to keep the wake with him because “my soul is sad to death”.  Jesus was praying with such earnestness that his “sweating was of blood”. Jesus had no choice but to obey his father and urged God “Father, if it were possible to take away this biter cup, but it is not as I wish but as you want”

            Judas approached Jesus in the garden of Gethsemane and kissed him several times on the cheeks. Judas was thus telling Jesus, according to the Levant customs, that as of this instant they are on a par in ranks and that Judas decided that he no longer considers Jesus as the Messiah. Some one of a lower rank would shake hands and fake to kiss the right hand and the higher ranked person would fake a kiss on the cheek. Judas was using a custom for greetings that could also be used as a sign for the soldiers to get hold of the leader.

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Along for the Ride by Sarah Dessen

This is a review of an ARC of Along for the Ride by Sarah Dessen. The book is slated for a June 2009 release.

I adore this book. It was just what I needed: very readable, interesting three-dimensional characters, recognizable/believable situations that progressed the story and added to the characterization. I even learned a little something. 

Ever since I began dating my current boyfriend, reading has taken a back seat (and why not when he was more entertaining than anyone or anything else). But I actually told him to bugger off because I had to continue reading this book! It was a pleasure to read! Thank you, Sarah Dessen.

Saturday, March 21, 2009

The Eyre Affair - Jasper Fforde - My rating 7/10

Take a pinch of Douglas Adams’ Hitchhiker Guide to the Galaxy, add a tea spoon of Terry Prachett’ Discworld novels and stir it until firm with a full cup of Stephanie Plum (THE Bond Agent) from Janet Evanovich to discover a brand new type of fiction: the Eyre Affair. It all happens in a world where dominant values are not defined by ephemeral fashion or where heroes and stars are not built and destroyed by flashy TV channels or gossipy magazines. It is a world where the biggest stars are Brontë Sisters, Jane Austen, Virginia Woolf and other Bacon. A world where most valuable items are not diamonds but original books (and the control over them and time).

A fresh, humorous and very original fiction with as many glorious as (unfortunately) lengthy moments. Overall a good laugh-out-loud page turner. A perfect reading for vacation.

Short Description (Amazon):

Fforde’s heroine, Thursday Next, lives in a world where time and reality are endlessly mutable–someone has ensured that the Crimean War never ended for example–a world policed by men like her disgraced father, whose name has been edited out of existence. She herself polices text–against men like the Moriarty-like Acheron Styx, whose current scam is to hold the minor characters of Dickens’ novels to ransom, entering the manuscript and abducting them for execution and extinction one by one. When that caper goes sour, Styx moves on to the nation’s most beloved novel–an oddly truncated version of Jane Eyre–and kidnaps its heroine. The phlegmatic and resourceful Thursday pursues Acheron across the border into a Leninist Wales and further to Mr Rochester’s Thornfield Hall, where both books find their climax on the roof amid flames.

Friday, March 20, 2009

A Kind Hand in Times of Darkness?- Thoughts on Loving God and Helping People

Mental health is a big issue, and in my own life it has become a topic with which I am highly interested.  Between spending a weekend learning from To Write Love on Her Arms counsellors to my pending arrival in seminary, the thought of dealing with mental health issues as a pastor has been square in my focus recently.  I do not believe there is any other social good the church can do that is in more need in mainstream America today than to be able to counsel people on mental health issues.  Sure, there are poor people.  And of course there are those with AIDS or other physical ailments.  But by in large, Americans are wealthy, healthy people (which, as an aside, makes the health-wealth-and-prosperity gospel all that more ridiculous since we are already much healthier and wealthier than 95% of the world).  However, what we are not is a very psychologically stable bunch.  Mental health issues such as depression, addiction, self-injury and suicide affect many Americans, regardless color, class, or gender, and should be just as prime a target of our churches as any other more tangible need.

A question that arises in mental health then, at least from the Christian perspective, is what can we say about it?  I will state right off that I think Christians can say a lot on the topic of mental health and that a reluctance to do so has led to a number of worsened conditions over the years.  Some mental health issues have a physical component to them, and handling that with medication should not be frowned upon.  But, where it really gets gritty is in trying to flesh out what we see the ultimate goal of the sufferer to be.  Is it just to contain a condition?  Or should we attempt to extinguish an issue altogether, if that is even possible?  Are we to rely on secular psychology or only Christian theology?

You can work through these questions on your own, as I have been doing and keep doing the more and more I am confronted with it.  As you think on it though, I would like to point you to a quote from John Piper talking about social justice that I think we can use to glean some information for ourselves in this situation:

“If you don’t love God, you can’t do anybody any ultimate good.  You can feed them and clothe them and house them and keep them comfortable while they perish.  But in God’s mind, that by itself is not what love is.  Love does feed and clothe and house- and keeps the commandments that include helping others know and love God in Christ.  But if you don’t love God, you can’t do that.  So if you don’t love God, you can’t love people in the way that counts for eternity.” [Finally Alive, pp.135-136]

Think about that.  Think about what it he means by “lov[ing] people in the way that counts for eternity.”   What might that look like for a Christian pastor or counsellor? and what is meant by “lov[ing] God” in such a way that doing this is possible?  If we really understand and embrace this thought I think it will inform a great deal of Christian psychology and will help us who desire to be pastors to actually be effective pastors in the truest meaning of the word.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Passing The Plate:Why Christians Don't Give Away More Money by Christian Smith & Michael O Emerson

Christians in the United States who are actually members of churches earned a total collective 2005 income of more than $2 trillion. Christians in the United States who actually attend church twice a month or more often or who consider themselves strong or very strong Christians earned a total collective 2005 income of also more than $2 trillion. Needless to say, more than $2 trillion earned every year is a huge amount of money. It is more than the total Gross Domestic Products of every nation in the world except, at most, the six wealthiest, United States, Japan, Germany, China, United Kingdom and France. pg 12

This is not the most amazing statistic in this book. in fact, having just learnt the immense wealth of American Christians, one of the most amazing, if not shocking stats is:

At least one out of every five American Christians – 20 percent of all U.S. Christians – gives literally nothing to church, para-church or nonreligious charities. 

The mean % given by Christians is 2.9% of income. 2.9%!!!!

This book is filled with such stats and results of surveys taken regarding the giving habits of US Americans and it is an eye opener. Of course the book builds towards the big question - WHY!

Everything involved in the matter of voluntary Christian financial giving takes place within the larger context of a massive economy, powerful culture and ubiquitous advertising and media industries that are driven by and dedicated to the promotion of mass consumption…. Therefore every Christian impulse to generously give money away inevitably runs up against potent counter-impulses driven by mass consumerism to instead perpetually spend, borrow, acquire, consume, discard and then spend more on oneself and family.  Such forces are not merely matters of personal values but are structured into deep rooted institutions of employment, transportation, media, home ownership, entertainment and material luxuries…..

In other words, Christians are caught up, hook line and sinker, in the world and how the world thinks. We have bought houses we can barely afford, cars which we can barely afford, High Definition T.V’s which we can barely afford. 

What challenged me from reading this book is (and this is my take on it) - Christians need to begin getting lower mortgages, to buy less expensive houses (i.e. we can afford this much but lets buy a  house $100,000 / $50,000 less so we can give more to the kingdom) - buy cheaper cars, buy cheaper T.V’s, buy cheaper phones, buy cheaper clothes so that we do have extra money in our budget to give to the kingdom. We may be ABLE to afford the $500,000 house, but lets make a choice to buy the $300,000, or even $200,000 house BECAUSE WE WANT TO GIVE TO THE LORD -  let THAT be the reason and driving force of our spending decisions - We may be able to afford the new SUV at $30,000, but lets buy the $14,000 used car so that there is room in our budget to give money away.

In other words, a radical transformation from Christians on the issue of money could literally change the world.

One thing is for sure - more of the $2 trillion income of christians needs to get out of Christians hands and into the world.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

Touched by an angel #5

I thought I could make a dash to the next chapter but alas no. Just a few lines down from John Cornwell’s jibe about King Lear and Wordsworth’s “Daffodils”1 (see: Touched by an angel #4) sparkles a real gem.

Fifth in a series responding to John Cornwell’s Darwin’s angel: an angelic riposte to The God Delusion.2

See also: Touched by an angel #1; #2; #3; & #4

Gospel truth

Richard Dawkins

Remember Cornwell is an angel, addressing Richard Dawkins his wayward protégé:

[Y]our separation of fact and fiction, true and false, reality and imagination, science and everything else, could not be more plain. The only difference between The Da Vinci Code and the gospels,” you pronounce in your God Delusion, “is that the gospels are ancient fiction while The Da Vinci Code is modern fiction.” That settles the hash of the Four Evangelists, you maintain. The Da Vinci Code, which is not factual, is fiction; the Gospels are not factual (because they have all those factual inconsistencies, as you note), therefore the Gospels are fiction. So are you inviting your readers to infer that poets, dramatists, novelists are not concerned with truth-telling either? It’s one thing, I suppose, to suggest that Christ’s Sermon on the Mount contains no truths, but do you really wish your readers to accept that writers such as Chaucer, Shakespeare, Dickens, Dostoyevsky … the entire canon of world literature … is just so much untruth? Fiction?

Does anyone understand the point Cornwell is making? I think I understand the point I think he thinks he is making. He seems to be painting Dawkins as a philistine, with no appreciation of art, creativity and aesthetic truth - and therefore not a writer worth taking seriously?

Let us look at what Dawkins actually says, and in context. He is going through a set of different Arguments for God’s existence which have been used over the centuries. One is The argument from scripture:

There are still some people who are persuaded by scriptural evidence to believe in God…3

A version of this argument is that God exists because Jesus said he was the Son of God. Five pages of reasons follow why, in Dawkins’ opinion, this argument falls down, on the basis that the gospel accounts cannot be taken as factual because collectively they contain so many inaccuracies and contradictions.

For the moment we are not discussing the merits of the case, just the structural logic. The ‘argument from scripture’ presupposes that the gospels are to be taken as factual accounts. If they are not factual accounts they cannot serve as evidence for any substantive reality which they might refer to. They could of course serve as evidence for something else, for example something about themselves as texts. Word usage or, perhaps more specifically, atrocity count in the text of Titus Andronicus could count as evidence for or against Shakespeare’s authorship of the play. But nothing in the text of Titus Andronicus has any bearing on the historical Titus Andronicus because there was no historical Titus Andronicus. It is pure fiction, adapted from a story in Ovid’s Metamorphoses.

Either the gospels are factual accounts or not. If they are, then they could support the argument from scripture; if not, not. Dawkins gives reasons why they cannot possibly be taken as reliable factual accounts and concludes they are fiction. Because they are fiction they cannot support the argument from scripture, which is what this section of The God delusion is about.

Dan Brown

The section ends:

Dan Brown’s novel The Da Vinci Code, and the film made from it, are arousing huge controversy in church circles. Christians are encouraged to boycott the film and picket cinemas that show it. It is indeed fabricated from start to finish: invented, made-up fiction. In that respect, it is exactly like the gospels. The only difference between The Da Vinci Code and the gospels is that the gospels are ancient fiction while The Da Vinci Code is modern fiction.4

I have no idea what Dawkins thinks of The Da Vinci Code5, or whether he has even read it. It is irrelevant. Dawkins’ reason for using The Da Vinci Code as the example here rather than The Canterbury Tales, Titus Andronicus or Oliver Twist is that although it is a work of fiction it had a significant recent impact among certain religious communities. The point of the example is to show that a work of fiction can have an impact on religious believers. There is nothing in the example to suggest anything Dawkins may or may not think about imagination, literary creativity, or the aesthetic truth or value of any novel, legend, poem, play or opera libretto, be it The Da Vinci Code or anything else from ‘the entire canon of world literature.’ Or indeed anything else anyone might get from the gospels. It is purely about the factual status of the gospels and whether anything they say can support a truth claim about the existence of God.

Perhaps this is an example of the ‘sharper logic’ and ‘closer insight’ our generous angel promised us? (See Touched by an angel #1.)

The chapter ends in a lament for (and a quote from) the Richard Dawkins of The selfish gene, with its redemptive appeal to what Cornwell has to call ‘imagination’ to make his point, but which is actually (and very clearly) moral consciousness:

We have the power to defy the selfish genes of our birth and, if necessary, the selfish memes of our indoctrination. We can even discuss ways of deliberately cultivating and nurturing pure, disinterested altruism - something that has no space in nature, something that has never existed before… We… have the power to turn against our creators. We, alone on earth, can rebel against the tyranny of the selfish replicators.6

See how Cornwell bends it:

Such an affirmation would accord with the intellectual and imaginative freedom of poetry, literary fiction, art; would be in accordance, too, with a measure of human liberty and moral agency. [Emphasis added.]

Dawkins’ paragraph was about human liberty and moral agency. It is consistent with intellectual and imaginative freedom. Not the other way round. But because Cornwell has decided Dawkins was talking about imagination, he now feels free to unpack what imagination means to an angel:

Imagination enables human beings to contemplate and model their past and their future, their origins and their destiny, their meaning and their nature: to make choices; to think scientifically and religiously too.

See how religion sneaks in? The author of The selfish gene and the author of The god delusion would doubtless agree that human beings have the power to think religiously. But that is not what Dawkins is saying here. If he had been he might have added something about what happens when religious imagination results in metaphysical conviction about the inhabitants of a supernatural realm.

Scientific and religious imagination are different, says Cornwell, but both have

the capacity… to make metaphors. But you appear… to have retreated from a trust in the dynamic, protean power of imagination when it comes to religion. Have you retreated because you no longer believe in the power of the imagination to impart literary, poetic, religious, and moral truth either?

The rhetoric is so preposterous it is hard not to labour the point. Dawkins defined his target: see Touched by an angel #3. His target is not religion in general. It is not religious metaphor or religious imagination. It is quite specifically the god of the ‘God Hypothesis’, the hypothesis that

there exists a superhuman, supernatural intelligence who deliberately designed and created the universe and everything in it, including us.7

A superhuman, supernatural, super-intelligent creator does not need to be sneaked in through a list of creatures of human imagination. Anything less is not the target of The God delusion.

The rhetoric continues:

Or because trust in the imagination threatens your militant atheism? Even a guardian angel cannot enter into the soul of a protégé’s conscience.

Some rhetoric is so preposterous it really can stun you into silence.

References

 John Cornwell, Darwin’s angel: an angelic riposte to The God Delusion, Profile Books, London, 2007.

John Cornwell, 2007: 1 above.

 Richard Dawkins, The god delusion, Bantam, 2006.

Richard Dawkins, 2006: 3 above.

Dan Brown, The Da Vinci Code, Doubleday, 2003.

 Richard Dawkins, The selfish gene, OUP, 1976.

Richard Dawkins, 2006: 3 above.

© Chris Lawrence 2009.

Book review: Infinite Jest by David Foster Wallace

As mentioned before, occasionally I write reviews for the website www.goodreads.com. I’m in the middle of reading a few books at the moment, so I don’t have anything piping hot and fresh, but I would like to share some of my favorite reviews I’ve written. This one is of David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest.

——————————————————————————————

A preface: If you haven’t yet read Infinite Jest, this review won’t serve to persuade you to make the commitment. Other reviews will tell you how long and complex this book is, or how some of the vocabulary comes straight out of the Oxford English Dictionary’s left field, or tell you how brilliant or pretentious or overwritten or other Red Flag words the book and author are tagged with. Et cetera, et cetera.

A review: In his book Howard’s End, E.M. Forster wrote, “Only connect!”

That short little diddy has long been one of my favorite literary quotes; and although I have no tangible evidence to prove either way, I think a variation of this ran through David Foster Wallace’s mind constantly.

I had the misfortune of having started this just a few weeks before DFW committed suicide, so naturally, my perspective on the book changed mid-read. For those of you have read Infinite Jest, recall how Hal starts perceiving the world horizontally instead of vertically. Yeah, it’s kinda like that. Adding to the emotional baggage of this read was an uncle of mine who also committed suicide a year prior, not to mention a few good friends who have been to rehab and recovery houses. Then, on top of that, is the capitalized Personal Identification I discovered having with DFW too, which quite possibly transcends ways in which I am able to coherently express.

Suffice to say, circling back to the quotation above, you know how some have said words and language are the only real way we connect as human beings, right? Well, to me, Infinite Jest is Wallace’s personal own Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI), his way of sending out a transmission signal that said, “I’m here. We’re here. We’re alive and suffering, trying to be happy, living the only way we can. Please respond. Please Identify. Please commit.”

Last night after I closed Infinite Jest for the final time, I had an image in my mind of DFW presiding over a dying plant and slitting his own wrists to water it with blood. I think it will stick with me for some time.

Concluding thoughts: this review is probably too somber and narrow, and I find it difficult to say what really matters without going on and on and on and on, so it’s time to cinch up the tourniquet and spare the limb. It’s worth noting how compulsively laugh-out-loud hilarious this book can be, and how the philosophical digressions will get you nodding affirmative, the observations of persons, places, and things so spot-on and vivid some won’t want to leave your head, a literary entertainment so gentle and brash and enlightening and real, and yes, entertaining too, that I will truly miss reading it.

What more can you say about a book than that?

Monday, March 16, 2009

How Long Will the Recession Last?

Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Fed, voiced his opinion this morning that the current recession should ease up within the next 12 months and give way to some solid growth. Does this mean we’re out of the woods?

Well, maybe and maybe not. I certainly don’t have Bernanke’s background and resume, but if there’s one thing I do know about economics, it’s that it’s an uncertain science. In other words, spending and confidence might be back to normal tomorrow, but they also might not. What’s more, I know that it’s his job to help instill that confidence, so I’m going to take his statement with a grain of salt.

I mention all of this today because there are lots of salespeople out there who are taking a ‘wait it out’ approach to the recession. Hold on long enough, they figure, and things will get better. In the long run,  of course, they’re absolutely right. But burying our heads in the sand, or waiting for better economic weather, entirely misses the point: a recession is a great time to grow your business!

So while the rest of the world is hanging on every word that the big name economists utter, take a more proactive approach and get busy selling. There are a lot of small buyers, bargain hunters, and underserved clients out there. Now is the perfect time to add them all into your client list. Certainly, the recession will end, sooner or later, but the question you should be asking yourself isn’t what month or year it will be over – but how much money are you going to make in the meantime, and how many new customers you’ll have when it is.

Book Review: Tactics by Greg Koukl

Tactics, by Gregory Koukl,  is a Christian apologetics book with a difference. It does not focus on issues in Christian apologetics (like, for example, Lee Strobel’s excellent The Case for Christ books). Instead it focuses on strategies for having productive conversations with people about these apologetic issues.

If you have ever walked away from a conversation, thinking about all the things you wish you had said but did not think of at the time, this book is for you. Koukl gives you the tools to say the things you would want to say at the time when you need them, not half an hour later. This is why the book is called Tactics. He is giving you tactics for having productive conversations about your faith.

Christians are often confronted with broad statements that are meant to discount the Christian faith in one sentence. Here are a few examples: “The Bible is full of errors”, or “All religions are basically the same”, or “It is arrogant to think that your view is the right one.”  Koukl notes that most Christians stumble over their words to try and refute these broad claims, instead of asking the person to provide evidence for such broad statements. His approach reminded me of Tim Keller’s challenge to skeptics, to doubt their own doubts (see Keller’s book The Reason for God. I reviewed it here).

Koukl’s basic tactic is called ‘the Columbo’ (named after the famous TV detective), where he asks the question “What do you mean by that?” His purpose in asking this question is to clarify what the person is saying, making sure he understands it, and making sure they themselves understand it, since many people are just repeating statements to which they have not given much deep thought. It also gives you time to think.

His second part of the Columbo has to do with the burden of proof. Here he asks the person to support the opinion they have expressed. As Koukl puts it, “It’s not your duty to prove him wrong. It’s his duty to prove his view.” The question that Koukl uses is “How did you come to that conclusion?”

Koukl’s two Columbo questions, “What do you mean by that?” and “How did you come to that conclusion?” are simple but powerful. Instead of having to squirm and feel bad because you are not an expert on every area of apologetics (thinking to yourself, ‘If only Ravi Zacharias were here to help me!’), you make the other person squirm by asking them to explain and justify their statement. You don’t really have to know much about the apologetics issue they have raised, since you are just asking them to elaborate and support their opinion. (Koukl would still certainly encourage readers to learn more about apologetics, but his point is that you don’t have to know everything about an issue to be able to challenge a person’s statement.)

Koukl notes that many people can’t answer these two basic questions and it quickly becomes evident that they are uninformed and cannot support the statement they have made. His goal when interacting with people is to metaphorically ‘put a rock in their shoe’, causing them to walk away thinking about the conversation in a way that challenges them to reconsider their view of Christianity, and that draws them them one step closer to the Lord.

Koukl’s explanation of “The Columbo” takes up about half of the book. The second half deals with how to handle various forms of self-refuting statements. Koukl does a great job helping you to identify this type of statement (for example: “You can’t know anything for sure”, Koukl’s response: “Are you sure about that?” )

I really enjoyed this book. It is an easy read and I gobbled it up in just over a day. The tactics are practical and the examples are helpful in illustrating his points. He provides a summary at the end of each chapter, and the book’s main points are easy to remember.

I would strongly recommend this book to any Christian who is interested in being ready to share their faith in an intelligent and effective way, by learning tactics to respond to challenges to their faith that will inevitably come.

Koukl, Gregory, Tactics, Zondervan, Grand Rapids, 2009, 207 pages.

You can purchase Tactics here from chapters.ca

Sunday, March 15, 2009

Crochet book: Tea Time of Yarn

Tea Time of Yarn   毛糸のティータイム—藤田智子のニットルーム

  

 

Book:  Tea Time of Yarn by Tomoko Fujita 藤田智子 2006, 72 pages, ISBN: 4861912016.

A couple of days ago I got post from Amazon, Japan:-))  5 great crochet books, which were delivered pretty fast: Only 9 days from Asia to Europe.

Amongst them is this little gem by Tomoko Fujita: Tea Time of yarn.  It contains 16 crochet projects, 14 of them are food related:

A funny tea cozy (see front cover), strawberry-, pineapple-, watermelon-, pear-, egg- and apple pouches, doughnut brooches, a chocolate cake tissue box and more. The patterns are made with care for details and can easily be remodeled to coasters, dishcloths or embellishments for clothes. The layout is also made in a simple but tasteful style.

 I haven’t started any of the projects yet, but the instructions look very clear, so Japanese skills will hopefully not be necessary. Every project is accompanied with a stitch diagram.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Japanese Fishermen's Coats from Awaji Island

Japanese Fishermen’s Coats from Awaji Island (Fowler Museum Textile Series 5) arrived on my doorstep this morning, just in time for a leisurely read over tea and breakfast. And what an enjoyable read it was!

This slim volume starts off with an historical essay by Luke Roberts, Fishing Villages in Northern Awaji, about the life and times of Awaji Island fishermen. Accompanied by modern photos and Edo era illustrations, this essay presents a taste of the culture and economy of Awaji Island at the time when these garments were the height of local fashion. I’ll admit that as I purchased this book more for the photographs than the essays, I’ve mostly skimmed this essay but will definitely read it later. 

The second half of the book, Waves and Folds, the Life of Fishermen’s Coats is chock full of gorgeous photos of indigo dyed sashiko garments worn by Awaji fishermen and sewn by the industrious wives and mothers of these men. Also included are firemen’s jackets and examples of kogin (similar to sashiko but more ornamental and complex). Tsutsusode and makisode, two variations of kimono sleeve design often seen in Japanese mingei are also explained, which I found very helpful. 

I highly suggest this volume if you are interested in historical uses of shashiko and design ideas. It is not a how-to book, but certainly worth reading if you are looking for more advanced techniques to replicate or expand on.